Brief Description
Pupils are introduced to various abuses of statistics,
including errors in representation and presentation and errors of
omission.
Design time: About 4 hours
Aims and Objectives
On completing this unit pupils should be able to criticize
constructively any of the more common misuses of data in
advertising or argument. Specically, they should be able to
identify bar charts using bars of different wid ths, the omission
o f scales, the use of a false origin, percentages calculated on
the wrong base, the use of meaningless phrases (such as 'up to 20%'),
the use of exaggerated scales, false prediction lines, and true
statements selected only because they support an argument. They
should be aware of the effect of these abuses on the general
impression given. They should know the true measures of 'average'
and the differences between them.
They will have practised drawing bar charts, drawing graphs of
time series, making up their own misleading representations,
calculating a median and a mean, reading tables, and using data
in an argument.
They will be more aware of the ways statistics can be used and
abused, of the need to look back at the original data, of the
need to look at all the appropriate data, of the effect of
variability and of the fact that many items may be better than
the average, but they are not necessarily the best.
Prerequisites
Pupils need to be able to draw a bar chart, plot points on a
graph and be able to calculate a simple mean and find the mode.
Equipment and Planning
It is most desirable that, before beginning this unit, pupils
should collect examples of advertisements from newspapers,
magazines and television that use statistical terms or ideas.
This collection then forms the basis of the initial discussion
and some of the later work. Graph paper is needed, but no other
extra material is essential.
Section A introduces some of the better-known
techniques of misleading statistical representation. Section B
looks briefly at some of the problems connected with the word 'average'.
Section C shows how even the truth can be misleading if
only selected truths are quoted. It is set in the context of a
debate on extending Birmingham Airport; an alternative in these
teachers' notes uses immigration as the subject under discussion.
Detailed Notes
'There are lies, damned lies and statistics'. 'You can prove
anything with statistics'. 'He uses statistics like a drunkard
uses a lamp-post: for support rather than illumination.'
These are just a few quotations warning of the dangers of
abuses in statistics. It is highly desirable that the general
citizen be aware of these limitations. For often the
misrepresentations are not sophisticated, yet they can still be
damaging and misleading. It is hoped that a careful examination
of a few commoner abuses will lead pupils to a greater critical
awareness of dealing with statistical data.
Below is presented a list of different types of abuses of
statistics and some general principles in helping to spot them.
It is not an exhaustive list. Some of these could be investigated
through suitable examples from newspapers, magazines or
television.
It would be worthwhile giving the pupils a list of these
abuses and discussing them at the end of the unit.
Abuses
- Eye compares volumes or areas rather than lengths in
diagrams (A1, B4).
- Different size pie charts can distort differences
unfairly.
- Spurious accuracy (8.387% of people, etc.)
- Quoting figures out of context (A1, B2,
C1).
- Lack of scale or curtailed scale (A1).
- Prediction and difficulties entailed (A1, C1).
- Using the particular 'average' which sounds best (B2,
B4).
- Bad or misleading questions on a questionnaire.
- Self-select sample answering a questionnaire.
- Inferring individual results from an average, and
ignoring spread (B4).
- Spurious or irrelevant connections (A1, B5,
C1).
- Quoting meaningless or irrelevant figures (A1, C1).
- Selecting only the data which support an argument (B2,
C1).
Almost any statistical technique can be abused.
The sort of questions one should ask when dealing with
possible abuses are: Who says so? On what evidence? What is
missing? Does it make sense?
Section A
It is valuable and instructive for pupils to make up a
scrapbook or collage of advertisements which misuse statistics.
Advertisements are designed to sell, and the temptation to
overstate one's case is often very strong. It is interesting to
see how often it is difficult to find the price of a product. The
initial discussion in a is to set the scene for
a more detailed study in the next sections. Try to get the pupils
to identify themselves with the detectives of Fact Ferrets.
A1
The widening of the bars and their shading should be
apparent to the pupils in a. They may also
notice the fat happy cat and the thin miserable cat. The
possibility of using a false zero, and its effect, is seen in
part 2 of Figure 2, and this is perhaps the most misleading
representation. Since the bars are different in part 1 it follows
that the answer to c is 3. An underlying
assumption is that 'more means better'; it is possible to have
too much of some of these ingrediants.
A2
The 'save 50%' is a common error. The saving should be
based on the original price not the sale price, as is brought out
in a and b. 'Up to 20% extra'
could, of course, include 'down to 100% less'. There is no
indication what the 20% is of. Does it mean that the tin of
Catchunks weighing 480g contains 20% more goodness than the one
weighing 400g, or is it making a comparison with some other cat
food? This supposes that we know what is meant by 'goodness', and
this is followed up in A4.
A3
Questions a, b and c
show how the graph has a false zero and an exaggerated scale. The
figures on the vertical axis have then been omitted to give a
distorted picture of a fairly minimal increase in sales.
A4
The points made here are more subtle, and pupils may
benefit from a class discussion before answering the questions.
A5
This section gives pupils a chance to put into practice
the faults they have seen in the previous sections and criticize
(ferret out) the attempts of their friends. This could be done
for homework. To draw together all the points from Section A
it is suggested that pupils should in c look
again at all the collected advertisements.
Section B
This section deals mainly with various abuses of the term 'average',
either by not indicating whether it is the mean, the median or
the mode that is being quoted, or by quoting an 'average' value
when it is the variability that is more important. B4 is
optional and looks at some fallacies connected with proportions.
In the text the fuller phrase 'arithmetic mean' has been used. In
practice this is often just abbreviated to 'mean', especially
when there is no danger of confusion with other 'means', such as
the harmonic mean and the geometric mean.
B1
Pupils may need some guidance in drawing the bar chart (or
vertical line chart). A linear scale from £0 to £500 should be
used on the horizontal axis to show the distribution, with the
large gap between £100 and £490.
B2
With a skewed distribution like this the mean is
affected by the single payment of £490, and the mode takes no
account of figures above the lowest category of £50. Putting the
wages in order gives the median £60, the wage of the 13th person.
If a single figure has to be given for wages, the median is the
least misleading here.
B3
The first three statements all make the point that a
single figure is sometimes useless, and that the distribution as
a whole is important. This point is also made in the fourth
statement, with house prices ranging so widely and being
different in different parts of the country. The illustration to
the fourth statement also shows another form of visual
misrepresentation. Does the eye see ratios of lengths, areas or
volumes? The ratio of the lengths is 2:1, areas 4:1 and volumes 8:1.
*B4
These inferences are incorrect because of the
proportions involved. More people drive in the daytime so, of
course, there are more accidents. Suppose, for example, in
statement 3, that 95% of drivers wear seat belts (it is
compulsory by law) and that 1 driver in 100 is injured. Then out
of every 10000 drivers there will be 100 injured, and 90 of these
will be wearing seat belts. The figures are shown in Table T1.
|
Wearing belt |
Not wearing belt |
|
Injured |
90 |
10 |
Not injured |
9410 |
490 |
|
9500 |
500 |
10000 |
Table - T1 Seat belts and injuries (fictitious)
From this it will be seen that the probability of injury when
wearing a seat belt is 90/9500 = 0.009,
whereas the probability of injury when not wearing a seat belt is
10/500 = 0.02, which is much higher;
This method is explained more fully in the Level Four unit Testing
Testing.
Section C
This is an important section because statistics are often
misquoted. Errors through omission or careful selection are
hardest to spot, yet unfortunately are widely prevalent. It is
relatively easy to make emotive and biased speeches as quoted. It
is much harder to make a clear analysis, and this is not usually
as interesting to listen to or read.
The local resident has carefully chosen his years. 1974 was
the first year for many years that passenger figures dropped. The
aircraft figures in 1973 were higher than neighbouring years, and
those in 1958 were lower than neighbouring years, so the ratio is
artificially high. It is arguable whether modern aircraft all
make more noise than older ones. The airport spokesman chooses
his figures just as carefully to achieve the opposite effect.
Table T2 gives the full version of Table 6 in the pupils'
notes.
Some other points that may come up in discussion are as
follows.
- Aircraft are larger and therefore carry more passengers.
- Therefore the number of passengers can increase somewhat
independently of aircraft numbers.
- As aircraft are larger, longer runways may well be
necessary.
- More passenger facilities will be needed as numbers
increase.
- Existing facilities should be taken into account.
- Some of the aircraft are privately or company owned and
therefore carry small numbers of passengers.
- Other aircraft just stop to refuel. Some aircraft carry
freight (see Table T2, the full version of Table 6).
- Access to the airport has been improved (extra bus routes,
the international railway station)
- National Exhibition Centre: this will attract passengers
who would previously have used Heathrow or Gatwick.
- Bearing point 10in mind, increased international business
would seem to be the result of the NEC development
leading to more air traffic at Birmingham Airport.
- Larger aircraft can be noiser.
Year |
Passengers |
Freight
(short tons) |
Commercial
aircraft movements |
Non-commercial
aircraft movements |
Total
aircraft movements |
1955 |
108666 |
614 |
6951 |
5145 |
12096 |
1956 |
154806 |
686 |
9627 |
12342 |
21969 |
1957 |
182919 |
751 |
10898 |
21736 |
32634 |
1958 |
168893 |
849 |
9710 |
15172 |
24882 |
1959 |
188065 |
1214 |
9174 |
22587 |
31761 |
1960 |
283833 |
2530 |
13779 |
17407 |
31186 |
1961 |
329862 |
2069 |
13402 |
21654 |
35056 |
1962 |
348319 |
2057 |
12845 |
19143 |
31988 |
1963 |
386419 |
2220 |
13311 |
21608 |
34919 |
1964 |
431806 |
2630 |
14264 |
25944 |
40208 |
1965 |
469511 |
3004 |
14287 |
33672 |
47959 |
1966 |
534558 |
4585 |
14345 |
31388 |
45733 |
1967 |
564418 |
4752 |
15089 |
36615 |
51704 |
1968 |
572172 |
5486 |
15287 |
39081 |
54368 |
1969 |
630735 |
5598 |
14330 |
32240 |
46570 |
1970 |
702559 |
6111 |
14344 |
31984 |
46328 |
1971 |
855485 |
5342 |
15978 |
42291 |
58269 |
1972 |
969718 |
4750 |
19068 |
43279 |
62347 |
1973 |
1181687 |
3869 |
21586 |
43690 |
65276 |
1974 |
1056002 |
3435 |
20397 |
39188 |
59585 |
1975 |
1130040 |
3004 |
19971 |
42472 |
62443 |
1976 |
1157635 |
2920 |
21936 |
44374 |
66310 |
1977 |
1113745 |
3568 |
21800 |
44284 |
66084 |
Table T2 - Traffic statistics, 1955-1977
(Source: Birmingham Airport Handbook 1976, 1977, 1978)
In the original tested version of this unit there was a
discussion on immigration, with a prejudiced speaker using
selected statistics to make his point. In areas where race was
not a sensitive issue this was well received, you may like to use
it for reinforcement of the ideas of Section C.
Table T3 gives the migration figures for 1966, 1972 and 1974.
Year |
|
New
Commonwealth1 |
Other
Countries |
Total |
1966 |
Immigrants |
76 |
143 |
219 |
Emigrants |
42 |
260 |
302 |
1972 |
Immigrants |
84 |
138 |
222 |
Emigrants |
45 |
188 |
233 |
1974 |
Immigrants |
51 |
132 |
183 |
Emigrants |
30 |
239 |
269 |
Table T3 - Migration to and from Great
Britain (thousands per year)
(Source: Population Trends)
1New Commonwealth excludes Australia,
New Zealand and Canada.
The pupils can then be asked the following questions.
- How many people left Britain in 1972?
- How many people entered Britain in 1974?
- In 1966 were there more immigrants to Britain than
emigrants from Britain?
- By how many did the population change? Which way?
- Describe the trend in immigration.
After being told the definitions that an immigrant is someone
who comes to Britain to settle and an emigrant is someone who
leaves Britain to settle elsewhere they can then be shown this
emotive speech.
'In 1966 over 75000 black immigrants came to settle in
England. This swelled to a massive 84000 in 1972. At this
rate over 100000 will come each year in the 1980s. We cannot
continue to absorb such large numbers. Our country is getting
more and more crowded. We must stop immigration now, let us
make England great again.'
They can then be asked:
- Take each of the sentences in the speech, your answers to
a to e, and the figures in the Table T3 to criticize the
speech. Is the speech fair?
Points that might be made on each of the sentences in the
speech are:
Sentence 1
Not all people coming from the New Commonwealth are
black: some are British returning home. In 1966 42000 people went
out to those countries. There have always been more white
immigrants than black immigrants into Britain.
Sentence 2
In 1972 General Amin declared 'Uganda for Ugandans'.
About 26000 people migrated to Britain because of this. So the
figure for 1972 is higher for special reasons. 84000 is small
compared with Britain's population of 54000000.
Sentence 3
In fact the trend of immigration from the New
Commonwealth has been 'downwards. The figure dropped to 52600 in
1973 and 51500 in 1974. There is no evidence to support the
figure of 100000.
Sentences 4 and 5
For rnany years more people have left Britain than have
come here to settle. There have been more emigrants than
immigrants. Britain is not getting more crowded because of
migration.
Sentence 6
This links immigration with 'greatness' without
explanation. There is no evidence given of any connection.
It might also be worth emphasizing that matters are rarely as
simple as they appear. Britons are hardly the ones to criticize
migration. The following points could be made as background.
- A large proportion, if not a majority, of Americans,
Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, etc., are
descendants of Britons. Is Great Britain their home?
Could they all return if they wished to?
- African Asians
- These were taken to Africa as part of the
development of the British Empire and have been
there for several generations.
- India has no more obligation to them than the UK
has to Americans wishing to migrate here. It is a
poorer country than the UK with a major
population problem. In fact, however, India did
accept large numbers of refugees.
- An obligation to these people had been entered
into by succeeding British Governments. But it is
fair to say that at the time it was not realized
that the numbers wishing to migrate would be so
large.
- West Indians and Moslem Asians
Many of these
were drawn here by British organizations, with Government
agreement, to help run the London Underground, railways
and hospital services, to do jobs that, at the wages
offered at that time, Britons were not interested in
doing.
- Immigration of other nationalities to run restaurants,
etc. Fish and chips are no longer the only take-away food
available.
Pupils can then be asked to write a fair speech on immigration.
Answers
A1 |
a |
See detailed notes. |
|
b |
Probably (ii) |
|
c |
See detailed notes |
|
|
|
A2 |
a |
75p, 50p, 25p, 1/3 |
|
b |
331/3% |
|
c |
See detailed notes. |
|
|
|
A3 |
c |
Similar to that in b |
|
d |
That in a |
|
e |
See detailed notes. |
|
|
|
A4 |
|
See detailed notes. |
|
|
|
B1 |
a |
Last column of table is (£550), (£360),
£400, £200, £490. Total £2000 |
|
b |
25 |
|
|
|
B2 |
a |
The mean and the mode |
|
b |
80, 60, 50 |
|
c |
£490 - £50 = £440 |
|
e |
The median |
|
|
|
B3 |
a |
See detailed notes. |
|
|
|
*B4 |
a |
See detailed notes. |
|
|
|
C |
a |
See detailed notes. |
|
b |
See detailed notes. |
|
c |
1113745 - 572172 = 541573 |
|
d |
66084 - 54368 = 11716 |
|
e |
See detailed notes. |
Test Questions
- An advertisement for Bark, 'the dog food made from trees,'
says:

The true figures (in standard units) are shown in Table 1.
|
Protein |
Vitamins |
Calcium |
Bark |
24 |
20 |
21 |
Average dog food |
23 |
18 |
20 |
Table 1 - Bark and the average of other dog foods
- Write down four ways in which the advertisement
is misleading.
- Draw a fair bar chart showing the figures of
Table l.
- Bark also advertises:

What is the true saving?
- Bark's sales for the years 1976 to 1980 are shown in
Table 2.
Year |
1976 |
1977 |
1978 |
1979 |
1980 |
Sales (thousands of tins) |
530 |
533 |
534 |
540 |
550 |
Table 2 - Sales of Bark
Draw a misleading graph of these figures so that Bark's
sales appear to be rising rapidly.
- On average it costs £20 to repair my motorbike. I have
£25 so I can afford to have it repaired'.
What is wrong with this argument?
- Table 3 shows, to the nearest thousand, the number of
votes cast at three successive elections for the
candidates of the three main political parties in one
constituency.
Party |
1st
election |
2nd
election |
3rd
election |
Votes |
% of those
voting |
Votes |
% of those
voting |
Votes |
% of those
voting |
Conservatives |
8000 |
40% |
10000 |
33% |
12000 |
30% |
Labour |
10000 |
50% |
15000 |
50% |
18000 |
45% |
Liberal |
2000 |
10% |
5000 |
17% |
10000 |
25% |
Total votes |
20000 |
30000 |
40000 |
Table 3
Total number of people eligible to vote: 10000
- Write down: a Two facts that the Conservatives
could state to show they were doing well.
- Two facts that Labour supporters could state to
show they were doing well.
- Two facts that Liberal supporters could state to
show they were doing well.
Answers
1 |
a |
Bars different width; no numbers on
vertical axis; vertical scale does not start from zero;
better than average does not mean better than all;
choosing three particular contents, why not others? |
|
|
|
2 |
|
50% |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Does not allow much for variability,
which is not quoted. Average £20 could give a single
bill well over £25. |
|
|
|
5 |
|
There are many answers. Some
possibilities are given below: |
|
a |
Every election we gained more votes. The
percentage of people voting Labour has been dropping.
Liberals have never been able to get more than a quarter
of the votes. |
|
b |
We have won all the elections. Every
time we get increasingly more votes than the
Conservatives. The percentage of people voting
Conservative is dropping steadily. |
|
c |
Every time we have had an increase in
the number of our voters. We have gained a bigger
percentage of the votes cast at each election.
Conservatives and Labour are each getting a decreasing
percentage of the votes at each election. We had five
times as many votes in the third election as we did in
the first. |
Connections with Other Published Units from the Project
Other Units at the Same Level (Level 3)
Car Careers
Net Catch
Multiplying People
Pupil Poll
Cutting it Fine
Units at Other Levels in the Same or Allied Areas of the Curriculum
Level 1
Leisure for Pleasure
Level 2
Authors Anonymous
On the Ball
Seeing is Believing
Level 4
Figuring the Future
Sampling the Census
This unit is particularly relevant to: General Knowledge,
Humanities, Mathematics, Commerce.
Interconnections between Concepts and Techniques Used In these Units
These are detailed in the following table. The code number in
the left-hand column refers to the items spelled out in more
detail in Chapter 5 of Teaching Statistics 11-16.
An item mentioned under Statistical Prerequisites
needs to be covered before this unit is taught. Units which
introduce this idea or technique are listed alongside.
An item mentioned under Idea or Technique Used is not
specifically introduced or necessarily pointed out as such in the
unit. There may be one or more specific examples of a more
general concept. No previous experience is necessary with these
items before teaching the unit, but more practice can be obtained
before or afterwards by using the other units listed in the two
columns alongside.
An item mentioned under Idea or Technique Introduced occurs
specifically in the unit and, if a technique, there will be
specific detailed instruction for carrying it out. Further
practice and reinforcement can be carried out by using the other
units listed alongside.
Code No. |
Statistical
Prerequisites |
Introduced in |
2.2a |
Bar Charts |
Leisure for Pleasure
Authors Anonymous |
3.1a |
Mode |
Seeing is Believing
Car Careers
Leisure for Pleasure |
3.1c |
Mean for small data set |
Seeing is Believing
Cutting it Fine |
|
Idea or
Technique Used |
Introduced
in |
Also
Used in |
1.2a |
Using discrete data |
Seeing is Believing |
Leisure for Pleasure
Car Careers
Cutting it Fine
Figuring the Future
Authors Anonymous
Net Catch
Multiplying People
Sampling the Census |
1.4b |
Using someone else's counted or measured
data |
Multiplying People
Sampling the Census |
Car Careers
Figuring the Future |
2.2b |
Pictograms |
|
Multiplying People |
4.1a |
Relative frequency of success |
|
|
5h |
Reading bivariate data |
Sampling the Census |
|
|
Idea or
Technique Introduced |
Also Used in |
1.2c |
Problems of data classification |
Authors Anonymous
Sampling the Census
Car Careers
Pupil Poll |
2.2j |
Plotting time series |
On the Ball
Multiplying People
Car Careers
Figuring the Future
Cutting it Fine |
3.1b |
Median for small data set |
Seeing is Believing |
3.2a |
Range |
Authors Anonymous
Cutting it Fine
Figuring the Future |
3.2o |
Dispersion in a distribution or
population |
|
5a |
Reading tables |
Leisure for Pleasure
Seeing is Believing
Multiplying People
Authors Anonymous
Car Career
Figuring the Future
On the Ball
Net Catch |
5b |
Reading bar charts, histograms and pie
charts |
Leisure for Pleasure
Multiplying People
Seeing is Believing
Car Careers |
5c |
Reading time series |
Leisure for Pleasure
Multiplying People
Car Careers
Figuring the Future
Cutting it Fine |
5f |
Comparing date when adjustments have to
be made |
|
5u |
Inference from bar charts |
Authors Anonymous
Car Careers
Multiplying People |
5v |
Inference from tables |
Leisure for Pleasure
Car Careers
Multiplying People
On the Ball
Net Catch
Figuring the Future
Seeing is Believing
Cutting it Fine
Sampling the Census |
5z |
Detecting trends |
Car Careers
Sampling the Census
Cutting it Fine
Multiplying People |
|